3. The enablers: Connection

3.2 Connection priorities and challenges

Table of Contents Chapter Table of Contents << Previous Section Next Section >>

Recent regulatory changes have laid the groundwork for more competition within the telecommunications sector and will stimulate investment in broadband infrastructure. The reforms of the past couple of years have been a watershed for the industry as entrants identify new market opportunities and larger telcos ramp up their investment in response to new market pressures.  Changes in the telecommunications sector will only accelerate as consumers respond to the availability of new and innovative services.

Through its role as regulator, customer and infrastructure funder, the government will take further steps to improve investment in New Zealand’s broadband infrastructure. There are two key priorities for action:

  • Promoting a robust and competitive telecommunications market.

  • Facilitating the deployment of high-speed broadband infrastructure.

Targeted actions under these two priorities will support the 2005 Digital Strategy objective of moving New Zealand up the OECD rankings in broadband uptake and the availability of advanced broadband services. Although new investments announced recently will make a difference to broadband performance, the government and business sectors still need to take concerted action to ensure bandwidth is no longer a constraint on New Zealand’s economic and social aspirations.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR TE PAHÜ //////
Te Pahü, a rural and farming community of about a thousand residents southwest of Hamilton, received funding through the Broadband Challenge to establish a wireless broadband service.

At first, many Te Pahü residents could only get poor-quality dial up. Some phone lines were too bad to allow an internet connection at all, and many customers suffered from electric fence interference. After rain, people’s telephones stopped working. 

Te Pahü already had a small internet community. This included an email neighbourhood watch and an enewsletter organised through a website, with community information and an events calendar.

After discussions with Velocity Networks, a partner in round one of the Broadband Challenge, and the University of Waikato’s Rural Link, the Te Pahü community was encouraged to apply for Broadband Challenge funding. Community members, especially local businesses, were keen to collaborate on the application, with the aim of providing high-speed internet to the community at a reasonable cost.

The project has been a huge success:

  • Households with network coverage can access good-quality broadband at a reasonable cost starting at $45 per month for 512kbps.
  • Residents no longer need separate phone lines. For $11 per month, they can access a phone service over the new network.
  • Telecom has since installed ADSL broadband in the Te Pahü exchange, so those who live nearby now have this option too.


It is critical that competition significantly improves, and soon. But encouraging competition is unlikely
on its own to give us the broadband infrastructure needed to transform the economy.

The government’s long-term vision is for fibre-to-the-home. However, the economics for this to occur in the short term are simply too challenging. As an intermediate step, four key infrastructure gaps have been identified where significant levels of new investment are required:
  • Fibre-to-the-node infrastructure (FTTN).

  • Urban fibre loops.

  • Rural broadband infrastructure.

  • New Zealand’s international connections.

New Zealand’s progress towards filling these gaps will be measured by:

  • the widespread deployment of FTTN, as an intermediate step towards fibre-to-the-home, so that by 2012, 80 per cent of users can access broadband connections of at least 20Mbps and 90 per cent have access to broadband connections of at least 10Mbps

  • having open-access urban fibre loops operating in 15 cities and towns by 2012, to support the high bandwidth needs of large businesses, and municipalities, universities, schools and hospitals (MUSH entities)

  • improving the coverage of terrestrial broadband, from 93 per cent to 97 per cent of the population by 2012, with more affordable satellite solutions for remote locations

  • an additional international cable by 2012, to make New Zealand’s international connections more resilient and improve competition in the supply of international bandwidth

  • ensuring all major public institutions, particularly within the health and education sectors, adopt effective demand aggregation strategies that enable the deployment of 1Gbps connections by 2012.

eRESEARCH IN NEW ZEALAND //////
New Zealand’s research community is essential to innovation. It is responsible for the creation of new technologies and has a key role in supporting new education topics and methodologies.

eResearch is real-time data sharing in research, science and technology using web-based tools and is rapidly developing in New Zealand.

Globally, all researchers need to collaborate better on research and education projects, exchange large volumes of data in real time, and gain access to large scale national and international infrastructure such as super computers. Having an ultra-fast advanced network such as the Kiwi Advanced Research and Education Network is only part of the picture. KAREN’s main role is to enable research and support tools such as:

  • virtual research environments – ‘virtual spaces’ created by information technology tools or systems
  • data repositories – online databases containing research data
  • grid computing – a group of geographically dispersed computers linked to function as a super computer.


8 Responses to "3.2 Connection priorities and challenges"
This does seem a very good idea in practice. but forcing the incumbant, Telecom, to build this infrastructure is not the best option. If anything we should take back the phone infrastructure and use government funding and have a very small charge for accessing the network. this would alow true competiton and lower prices in the telecomunications market. We also need more then oine company providing internation bandwidth to america, as currently the only choice is southern cross. this makes prices higher as it's a monopoly in NZ to america international bandwidth.
Nick Calder
Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:23 AM

This is all well and good but it's not a forward looking strategy, is it? There is nothing in here beyond DS1.0 other than a topical update on actions and intent.

One might also argue that "Promoting a robust and competitive telecommunications market" and "Facilitating the deployment of high-speed broadband infrastructure" are mutually exclusive options for a government given experiences to date.

There are also some vagueries in here - 'most' Kiwis to have accees to high speed broadband? The evidence in countries well ahead of NZ on the braodband ladder is that there has been a plateau in broadband adoption and the hard to reach remain just that. Where is the link in here to encouraging adoption... demand-led as well as supply-led?

I know it keeps the anoraks happy to see big numbers but the reality is that its hard to predict what braodband spec we will need in 5 or 10 years time, the point is it will be significantly greater than now and we are a long, long way from achieving it.
Andy Williamson
Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:44 PM

According to the World Internet Project there are two things that change how people use the internet - both the sophistication of services they use as well as the amount...

That is broadband and mobility. I am talking about mobility in the home/work/uout and about with a lap top and a wireless connection.

I agree with the comment that the strategy is not future focused enough, as well as ignores the very last of the 'last mile' getting computers in the hands of kiwis for work and play and doing it wirelessly - one laptop for every kiwi.
Elyssa
Friday, May 09, 2008 11:34 AM

The strategy as written, appears to make an assumption that "connection" means "physically connected". Connection can also occur wirelessly, through wireless (802.11), 3G, satellite.
mike(p)
Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:13 AM

Using wireless increases productivity because you are more likely to be connected, therefore (1) you receive information in a more timely fashion, and can make a more timely decision; and (2) you are more likely to meet people, to exchange ideas and innovate.

NZers avoid using 802.11 and 3G because of the business models associated with casual usage. This constrains our country's competitiveness and productivity.

Two examples:

In the US, wireless (802.11) is increasingly offered as a free service. This encourages people to meet and work in social settings, such as cafes, restaurants and parks.

To look for an address on Googlemaps, and instructions on how to drive there, will cost $8 in NZ, 16c in Germany, on a casual rate, http://www.drury.net.nz/2007/12/23/all-you-can-eat-mobile-data/

Increased usage of wireless technologies at reasonable prices is needed.
mike(p)
Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:41 AM

Having spoken to several major international users of datacenters, one of the reasons they will never host in NZ is lack of diverse routes.

They would feel more comfortable with 5 diverse international fibre connections based on previous experiences: http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/02/01/internet.outage/

Typically they also install an earth station as a further diverse route.

Sharing a satellite with Australia and the South Pacific, might be a useful strategy. It would have other uses, such as providing high-speed Internet, emergency communication.

These types of investment are strategic but we don't have the scale to do it ourselves. Can we be innovative and collaborate with our neighbouring countries, to build shared infrastructure?
mike (p)
Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:53 AM

More emphasis needs to be made of the importance of good connectivity, for sustainability and hence productivity.

Overseas case studies have shown that knowledge worker industries can have 20-40% of their staff do flexible work. This equates to less commuter traffic, less pressure on physical infrastructure (roads, CBD floor space (25% reduction)). Staff are more satisfied and productivity goes up (15%).
mike (p)
Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:01 AM

I agree with Mike (p) - pricing is key.

How telecoms are priced and packaged has always had one of the greatest impacts on service uptake.

Case(s) in point -

Local calls cost money in the UK so everyone is very aware of how much they spend and how many calls they make. End result - less local calls made.

$8 'capped rate' international calling did tons for international calling in New Zealand. People knew the rate was capped, so the worry factor went away. They also talked longer.

In sum, free would be nice, but understandable, capped and/or 'all you can eat' plans can have a similar affect increasing uptake and usage.

As an aside, I think another issue that has been created is some people may have a tainted view of broadband based on previous experience with paying big money for service that was marketed as 'broadband' but in reality was only just faster than traditional dial-up. Ouch.
Elyssa (T) :-)
Friday, May 16, 2008 12:30 PM